Production · Live
Use cases The three questions, answered

Three questions.
One platform.

Every day, you ask the world three questions. Most days you don't get answers — you get articles.

Verify a claim. · Read a situation. · Trace a cause.

Essence is built around the three questions. Each one returns a structured analysis — sources rated, contradictions named, gaps visible.

01 / 03The question of accuracy
In the appCHECK

Is this credible?

Verification, in seconds. Sources rated. Contradictions named. The reasoning visible.

The moment

A headline crosses your feed. Something does not sit right — but the feeling is faster than the analysis.

What you actually want

Who confirms, who contradicts, what is documented, what is missing. The evidence — not a verdict.

From a single input
Verification
when claim looks like a fact
~18 sources · tier-rated · verdict + confidence
Disinfo
when claim looks shaped
repetition · missing voices · pattern named
CHECK · Verification
90 seconds · 14 sources processed
Claim
Turkey is massing troops on the Syrian border.
Confirmed 9 sources
A Reuters A AFP B Al Jazeera + 6 more
Troop movements near Tal Abyad · satellite imagery from a defence outlet · corroborated by Reuters.
Contradicted 3 sources
C Daily Sabah C Yeni Şafak + 1 more
Report routine rotation — but their reporting predates the satellite data by 48 hours.
Traced to one origin 2 sources
Both reference a single Kurdish news agency · no independent corroboration.
Verdict
likely true
Confidence
74%
Scale
contested
Intent
unverified

You did not read an article. You read an analysis. The sources are named. The contradictions are named. The gaps are named. You decide what it means.

02 / 03The question of situation
In the appRADAR · CHECK Situation

What is happening?

A maintained picture of ~130 countries — observed continuously, structured by doctrine, ready when you open the app.

The moment

A region is suddenly in the headlines. One feed says ceasefire, another escalation. Fragments — not a picture.

What you actually want

A maintained situational picture — actors, moves, what changed in 48 hours. Running whether you are logged in or not.

From an input or no input at all
CHECK Situation
on-demand · ad-hoc question
actors · dynamics · escalation indicators
RADAR
continuous · always running
4 layers · ~130 countries · twice daily
RADAR layer 01
GeoMap
Events geo-located · color-coded by verification.
RADAR layer 02
Situation Room
Active fronts · briefings twice daily.
RADAR layer 03
Analytical Map
Country-level tension index · historical baselines.
RADAR layer 04
Event Stream
Every event as it enters · classified · sourced.
Global event map · Live
Pulling latest cycle…
RADAR · Situation Room
Monday · 06:00 UTC · twice-daily refresh
Four countries escalated overnight
Iran ESC high → critical
Hormuz blockade expanded
Most-likely Tensions persist 55–70%
Most-dangerous Direct naval confrontation 25–40%
Sudan ESC ↓ slightly
Ceasefire negotiations resumed
+ 2 more countries · view full briefings →

You did not read a single article. You read a picture. The picture was there before you opened the app. It will be there when you close it.

03 / 03The question of causation
In the appBRIEFING · DEEP DIVE · CAUSALITY

How did we get here?

Causal chains reconstructed. Plausible trajectories named with their conditions. Past, present, future on one structured view.

The moment

A crisis appears to escalate suddenly. Headlines tell you what happened — not how, and not what comes next.

What you actually want

The causal chain back from now — and conditioned trajectories forward. Not predictions: if X holds, Y; if Z breaks, W.

From a situation in the system
Briefing
doctrine-style synthesis
findings · assessments · source matrix
Deep Dive
single event, broken open
source matrix · gaps · triangulated scenarios
Causality
past → present → future
causal chain · 3 trajectories w/ conditions
CAUSALITY · Iran–US confrontation
seventy-year arc · 5 causal steps · 3 trajectories
Causal chain · reconstructed
1953
CIA-backed coup
1979
Islamic revolution
2015
Nuclear deal
2018
US withdrawal
2026
Escalation
now
Three trajectories · with explicit conditions
T1
Diplomatic recalibration
if Hormuz reopens within 30 days
T2
Sustained pressure
if sanctions tighten · proxy activity stable
T3
Open confrontation
if a naval incident occurs · within 60 days

The current moment is placed within a seventy-year causal sequence. Not because the past predicts the future — because the past constrains it. You see the chain, the present, and the futures it allows.

The three togetherOne platform · one method

Three angles on the same task — reading the world without losing the structure.

Limited beta · CHF 79 / month · cancel anytime
AI-assisted outputs inside a deterministic framework. How AI is used →